industry / 01 · frontier ai labs

Training data for frontier AI labs. Written by people who can grade the answer.

The open web has already been trained on. What moves a frontier model now is work that does not exist yet: graduate-level reasoning written out in full, preference calls from people who can check a proof, and test sets no crawler has seen. eeko's data practice commissions that work from a vetted network of working specialists, verifies every item, and licenses it so your counsel can sign.

Expert-written, second-expert reviewed Fingerprinted at intake Licence bound per item Pilot batch first
Hero image · 840 × 1050
first reply
1business day
from a data lead, not an autoresponder
items with signed provenance
100%
fingerprint, timestamp, licence, receipt
delivery formats
6
JSON Lines, CSV, Parquet, WebDataset, COCO, Croissant
before volume
1pilot batch
run it through your own pipeline first

What is training data for frontier AI labs?

Training data for frontier AI labs is the human-made material a lab cannot get by crawling: demonstrations written by specialists, preference judgments from people qualified to say which answer is actually right, adversarial prompts in domains where a wrong answer hurts, and evaluation items that have never been published anywhere. It is the data that improves a model once the easy tokens are used up.

Frontier teams are not short of text. They are short of text that teaches something the model does not already know, and short of test sets they can trust. Both problems have the same root: once an item is on the public internet, there is no way to tell whether the model reasoned its way to the answer or simply recalled it. The only fix is work that is new, made to order, and kept off the web afterward.

That is what eeko's data practice supplies, with the same discipline behind our enterprise AI agents and AI infrastructure work: a written spec, a pilot batch, named reviewers, and a verifiable record on every item. See the wider AI training data practice and how every item is verified.

Preference grading image · 2100 × 900
Pairwise judgments graded by a specialist, with a written rationale where your reward model needs one.

Three problems more tokens do not fix.

Each shows up as a flat eval curve. Each is a data problem with a data answer.

Contaminated benchmarks

Once a test item is public anywhere, your score measures memory as much as capability. Items written to order, hashed at intake, and licensed exclusively stay out of every future crawl, including your own.

Preference signal from the wrong raters

A rater who cannot verify a derivation rewards the answer that sounds surest. Reward models trained on that learn confidence, not correctness. Our graders can do the problem.

Model output feeding back in

Synthetic data compounds its own mistakes. Human-origin checks at intake, including generator signatures and C2PA and IPTC fields, keep machine-made work out or labeled as what it is.

Expert-written SFT, preference, and evaluation data, to your spec.

Six things frontier labs ask us for most. Each starts from a written specification and a pilot batch, and is held to the bar you agree after the pilot.

01 / sftCORE
Supervised fine-tuning demonstrations
Worked answers and full reasoning traces in mathematics, the sciences, law, medicine, and code, written to your rubric by a specialist and read again by a second one before they ship.
  • Step-by-step traces, not just final answers
  • Second-expert pass on every hard item
02 / preferenceCORE
Preference data for reward models
Pairwise and rubric-scored comparisons made by graders able to separate a correct proof from a persuasive one, with written rationales where your reward modeling needs the why as well as the which.
  • Pairwise, ranked, and rubric-graded
  • Disagreement preserved, not averaged away
03 / evalsEXCLUSIVE
Held-out evaluation sets
Test items composed for you alone, hashed at intake, checked against the registry for duplicates, and licensed exclusively so they never reach another buyer or another training corpus. See AI evaluation benchmarks.
  • Never published, never resold
  • Near-duplicate check before delivery
04 / safetySAFETY
Red-teaming and safety prompts
Attack prompts and graded replies, composed by specialists in fields where a bad answer has real consequences, screened before delivery. Covered in depth under red-teaming and safety data.
  • Domain-specific attack surfaces
  • Graded safe and unsafe responses
05 / multimodalCORE
Licensed multimodal corpora
Human-made images, audio, video, and documents from the eeko creator catalogue, each carrying its training permission and signed releases, for the pre-training and mid-training slices where your model is thin.
  • Human origin checked at intake
  • WebDataset or COCO delivery
06 / standingCORE
Standing orders
Capability targets move every quarter. A standing order keeps new, matching work arriving from the same reviewers at the same bar, with volume pricing and a spec you can amend as the model changes.
  • Same network, same review bar
  • Volume pricing from the first renewal

Human-made training data from people who do the work.

The eeko expert network is built around fields where correctness can be checked, and staffed by people who can check it.

Expert graders image · 1200 × 900
Specialists grade substance. A second specialist reads the contested calls.

Fields we staff for frontier work

  • Mathematics — proofs, derivations, and competition-level problems, written and graded by mathematicians in the network.
  • Medicine — clinical reasoning, differential diagnosis, and safety-critical dosing prompts from practicing clinicians.
  • Software — code, architecture decisions, and review traces from senior engineers.
  • Chemistry, law, finance, and language — synthesis routes from working chemists, statutory reasoning from attorneys, valuation logic from analysts, and acceptability judgments from linguists.

Every contributor is credential-checked before their first task. Every label records its source: the author, an AI suggestion, or an expert reviewer. You can filter on that in training.

What one reasoning trace carries by the time it reaches you.

An illustrative item lifecycle. The same checks run on every item, and the audit trail is hash-chained so nothing can be edited later without leaving a mark.

// item-0417.log batch.log audit-chain.log
tail -f
09:02 INTAKE Number theory proof submitted by a credential-checked mathematician against spec section 3.2.Identity verified · task rate stated before acceptance RECEIVED
09:02 FINGERPRINT Cryptographic hash computed and compared against every item already in the registry.No duplicate · no near-duplicate above threshold UNIQUE
09:03 ORIGIN Human-origin checks: generator signatures, C2PA record, IPTC digital-source-type fields.None detected · recorded as human-created HUMAN
11:40 REVIEW Second mathematician grades against the rubric. Step 4 skips a lemma the rubric requires.Returned to author with the reviewer's note attached RETURNED
14:15 ACCEPT Revised proof resubmitted, re-hashed, accepted. Exclusive licence bound, provenance record signed, independent timestamp anchored, item added to the signed delivery receipt.Both versions kept in the hash-chained audit trail SIGNED
Delivery image · 2100 × 900
Licensed LLM training data, shipped as JSON Lines, Parquet, or WebDataset, into your own storage or on-premise environment. The receipt is the index.

From capability gap to delivered batch.

Fixed scope and a fixed price once the spec is written. Nothing scales until the pilot batch has been through your pipeline.

STEP 01
Describe the gap
Tell us where the model is weak and what the eval says. Within one business day a data lead comes back with questions and an initial sourcing plan.
STEP 02
Write the spec
Fields, seniority, rubric, acceptance criteria, item counts, formats, licence, and timeline, all in one document you sign off.
STEP 03
Pilot batch
A small delivery through the full pipeline: fingerprint, origin check, review, licence, receipt. You test it in training before anything scales.
STEP 04
Production and standing orders
Volume at the agreed bar, or a standing order that keeps new work arriving as your targets move. Every batch carries the same record.

Frontier AI training data questions.

How is frontier lab training data different from web-scraped data?

Scraped data is whatever happened to be published, under rights nobody checked. Frontier lab training data from eeko is commissioned: a specialist writes or grades each item against your rubric, a second specialist reviews the hard ones, and the item carries its own consent record, licence, fingerprint, and signed provenance. The content is new, so it cannot already be in your pre-training mix, and the paperwork is complete, so your counsel does not have to guess.

How do you stop evaluation data from leaking into training sets?

Three ways. The items are written for you, not gathered from anywhere public, so there is no original to leak. Each one is hashed at intake and compared against our registry, which surfaces duplicates and near-duplicates before delivery. And the set ships under an exclusive licence, so we never offer it to another buyer. The signed receipt names each item by ID and hash, a reference to check against if you ever suspect a leak.

Who writes frontier model training data at eeko?

Working specialists from the eeko expert network: physicians, mathematicians, software engineers, attorneys, chemists, linguists, and financial analysts, among others. Each one passes a credential check before taking a task, and identity is verified before payment. Your dataset spec names the field and seniority required, so a graduate-level proof is graded by someone who has written graduate-level proofs. Each label states its source: the author, an AI suggestion, or an expert reviewer.

How much does expert-written training data cost?

The price follows four things: the expertise an item needs, the time it takes to write or grade, how deep the review goes, and the licence. A long reasoning trace with a written rationale and a second-expert pass costs more than a quick pairwise preference call. Exclusive rights cost more than shared rights. Volume and standing orders pull the unit price down. We quote a fixed price once the spec is written, after the scoping call.

Can we train commercial models on the data?

Yes, inside the licence you agree to. Every item records its AI-training permission, the licence terms, and whatever model or property releases apply. Items that show an identifiable person are released for training only when that person's consent is on file. We hand your legal team the full documentation chain from contributor to delivery; they decide whether it fits your intended use. We provide the record, not legal advice.

What file formats do you deliver frontier datasets in?

JSON Lines, CSV, Parquet, WebDataset, COCO, and Croissant metadata. Text-only work usually goes out as JSON Lines or Parquet, and multimodal corpora as WebDataset shards. If your loaders expect a particular schema, we write it into the spec and the pilot batch arrives in that layout. Each delivery comes with per-item provenance records and a signed receipt.

How long until the first batch arrives?

A real person replies within one business day of your request. The scoping call turns your capability gap into a written spec, usually inside a week. A pilot batch follows so you can run the data through your own pipeline before committing to volume. Production timelines depend on how rare the expertise is and how long each item takes; we put the dates in the spec rather than promising a number before we know.

Research team image · 2100 × 900
A held-out set your team can trust, because nobody else has ever seen it.

Tell us what the eval keeps getting wrong.

Send the capability gap in a few sentences. Inside one business day you hear back from a data lead with questions, an initial sourcing plan, and a path to a pilot batch. No deck. A ranked list.

Experienced within

  • SOC 2 Type II
  • ISO 27001
  • HIPAA
  • HITRUST r2
  • ISO 27701
  • PCI DSS
  • NIST CSF 2.0
  • CMMC
  • FedRAMP
  • GDPR

Markets served.

As an enterprise AI agency, eeko systems delivers production AI systems remote-first across the United States and internationally — including these markets:

New York City, New York (NY)

Los Angeles, California (CA)

Chicago, Illinois (IL)

Houston, Texas (TX)

Phoenix, Arizona (AZ)

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (PA)

San Antonio, Texas (TX)

San Diego, California (CA)

Dallas, Texas (TX)

San Jose, California (CA)

Austin, Texas (TX)

Jacksonville, Florida (FL)

Fort Worth, Texas (TX)

Columbus, Ohio (OH)

Charlotte, North Carolina (NC)

Indianapolis, Indiana (IN)

San Francisco, California (CA)

Seattle, Washington (WA)

Denver, Colorado (CO)

Washington, District of Columbia (DC)

Boston, Massachusetts (MA)

El Paso, Texas (TX)

Nashville, Tennessee (TN)

Detroit, Michigan (MI)

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma (OK)

Portland, Oregon (OR)

Las Vegas, Nevada (NV)

Memphis, Tennessee (TN)

Louisville, Kentucky (KY)

Baltimore, Maryland (MD)

Milwaukee, Wisconsin (WI)

Albuquerque, New Mexico (NM)

Tucson, Arizona (AZ)

Fresno, California (CA)

Sacramento, California (CA)

Kansas City, Missouri (MO)

Atlanta, Georgia (GA)

Miami, Florida (FL)

Colorado Springs, Colorado (CO)

Raleigh, North Carolina (NC)

Omaha, Nebraska (NE)

Long Beach, California (CA)

Virginia Beach, Virginia (VA)

Oakland, California (CA)

Minneapolis, Minnesota (MN)

Tulsa, Oklahoma (OK)

Arlington, Texas (TX)

New Orleans, Louisiana (LA)

Wichita, Kansas (KS)

Cleveland, Ohio (OH)

Tampa, Florida (FL)

Bakersfield, California (CA)

Aurora, Colorado (CO)

Honolulu, Hawaii (HI)

Anaheim, California (CA)

Santa Ana, California (CA)

Corpus Christi, Texas (TX)

Riverside, California (CA)

Lexington, Kentucky (KY)

St. Louis, Missouri (MO)

Stockton, California (CA)

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (PA)

Saint Paul, Minnesota (MN)

Cincinnati, Ohio (OH)

Greensboro, North Carolina (NC)

Anchorage, Alaska (AK)

Plano, Texas (TX)

Lincoln, Nebraska (NE)

Orlando, Florida (FL)

Irvine, California (CA)

Newark, New Jersey (NJ)

Toledo, Ohio (OH)

Durham, North Carolina (NC)

Chula Vista, California (CA)

Fort Wayne, Indiana (IN)

Jersey City, New Jersey (NJ)

St. Petersburg, Florida (FL)

Laredo, Texas (TX)

Madison, Wisconsin (WI)

Chandler, Arizona (AZ)

Buffalo, New York (NY)

Lubbock, Texas (TX)

Scottsdale, Arizona (AZ)

Reno, Nevada (NV)

Glendale, Arizona (AZ)

Gilbert, Arizona (AZ)

Winston-Salem, North Carolina (NC)

North Las Vegas, Nevada (NV)

Norfolk, Virginia (VA)

Chesapeake, Virginia (VA)

Fremont, California (CA)

Garland, Texas (TX)

Richmond, Virginia (VA)

Baton Rouge, Louisiana (LA)

Boise, Idaho (ID)

San Bernardino, California (CA)

Spokane, Washington (WA)

Des Moines, Iowa (IA)

Modesto, California (CA)

Birmingham, Alabama (AL)

Tacoma, Washington (WA)

Fontana, California (CA)

Oxnard, California (CA)

Fayetteville, North Carolina (NC)

Huntsville, Alabama (AL)

Moreno Valley, California (CA)

Rochester, New York (NY)

Glendale, California (CA)

Yonkers, New York (NY)

Augusta, Georgia (GA)

Amarillo, Texas (TX)

Little Rock, Arkansas (AR)

Akron, Ohio (OH)

Shreveport, Louisiana (LA)

Grand Rapids, Michigan (MI)

Mobile, Alabama (AL)

Salt Lake City, Utah (UT)

Huntsville, Texas (TX)

Tallahassee, Florida (FL)

Overland Park, Kansas (KS)

Knoxville, Tennessee (TN)

Worcester, Massachusetts (MA)

Brownsville, Texas (TX)

New Port Richey, Florida (FL)

Jackson, Mississippi (MS)

Providence, Rhode Island (RI)

Fort Lauderdale, Florida (FL)

Sioux Falls, South Dakota (SD)

Tempe, Arizona (AZ)

Cape Coral, Florida (FL)

Springfield, Missouri (MO)

Pembroke Pines, Florida (FL)

Eugene, Oregon (OR)

Peoria, Arizona (AZ)

Corona, California (CA)

Lancaster, California (CA)

Rockford, Illinois (IL)

Salinas, California (CA)

Palmdale, California (CA)

Springfield, Massachusetts (MA)

Charleston, South Carolina (SC)

Duluth, Minnesota (MN)

London, England (ENG)

Dublin, Ireland (IRE)